A Back Pass to Peace
King Limhi had
the difficult responsibility to try to help his people deliver themselves from
bondage to the Lamanites. They first
fought against the Lamanites when the Lamanites came upon them because of the
loss of their daughters to the priests of Noah, but the people of Limhi “fought
for their lives, and for their wives, and for their children; therefore they
exerted themselves and like dragons did they fight” and they were able to preserve
their lives (Mosiah 20:11). But the
Lamanites began to “exercise authority over them” and the people wanted to go
up to battle again against the Lamanites, and therefore Limhi “granted unto
them that they should do according to their desires.” They tried to fight the Lamanites, but “it
came to pass that the Lamanites did beat them, and drove them back, and slew
many of them.” The people mourned but
then cried again unto Limhi such that “their continual cries did stir up the
remainder of the people of Limhi to anger against the Lamanites; and they went
again to battle, but they were driven back again, suffering much loss.” They then “went again even the third time,
and suffered in the like manner.” They had
gone against the Lamanites four times total in battle, and they weren’t any
closer to freeing themselves from bondage than they had been in the beginning. They gave up for the time and “did humble
themselves even to the dust, subjecting themselves to the yoke of bondage” (Mosiah
21:6, 8, 11-13).
Though they knew then that they couldn’t
succeed against the Lamanites in battle without something changing, it seems to
me that for a while Limhi likely saw a successful battle against their enemies
as the only way that they could escape. When Ammon and his brethren arrived
from the land of Zarahemla, this boosted the spirits of the people and Limhi
declared, “O ye, my people, lift up your heads and be comforted; for behold,
the time is at hand, or is not far distant, when we shall no longer be in
subjection to our enemies, notwithstanding our many strugglings, which have been
in vain; yet I trust there remaineth an effectual struggle to be made” (Mosiah
7:18). Limhi was confident that the
people would be able to escape with the advent of these Nephite men to help
them, and from this language it seems that he still believed that it would be
through a battle—a “struggle”—that they were going to escape. They had had many “strugglings” in physical
combat and he had faith that they would yet have a fight with the Lamanites
that they would win. I imagine that in
his mind he really wanted to win against his enemies, perhaps wanting to avenge
all those who had been killed among the Nephites. These were Lamanites who had harassed and
killed and subjected his people to cruel bondage, and he saw only one path
forward: redeem those who had been lost by defeating the Lamanites and delivering
themselves out of bondage in glory.
But to his credit, Limhi allowed
himself to see another way and to accept the fact that there would be no
successful battle with the Lamanites, no glory of physical victory over his
enemies, even with the help of Ammon and his brethren. He consulted with the people and realized
that “it was impossible for the people of Limhi to contend with [the Lamanites],
thinking to deliver themselves out of bondage by the sword.” He humbly accepted the proposal of Gideon to
simply slip out “the back pass, through the back wall, on the back side of the
city” (Mosiah 22:2, 6). Instead of
trying again to avenge themselves of the enemies, the Nephites simply slipped
away into the night, leaving the possessions they couldn’t take with them for
the Lamanites to take. They gave up
their pride, gave up their desires for some kind of revenge against their enemies,
and saved their lives instead of their pride in a humble escape. I think this has a lesson for us as we face
our own challenges. Sometimes, after figuratively
fighting against a problem that we are determined to conquer in our way, we may
need likewise admit defeat and realize that we must approach it in a humbler, different
path. There may be a solution that we
simply cannot see because we want to conquer the problem the way we have
already been attacking it. Limhi’s
example shows us that indeed with the Lord’s help there will be “an effectual”
way to solve our problems, but it may be by giving up the glory of winning the struggle
and simply walk out our figurative back pass to peace.
Comments
Post a Comment
Comments: