Thou Hast Rewarded Me Good
As he walked among men the Savior gave this incredibly
difficult commandment: “Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good
to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and
persecute you” (Matt. 5:44). He
exemplified this, and throughout the scriptures I think we see examples of mortals
who both succeeded and failed at following this counsel.
One example in the Old Testament was David as
it relates to his relationship to Saul.
As David was gaining more and more power and clout among the people,
Saul became very jealous. Eventually
Saul couldn’t take it anymore and he told his servants “that they should kill
David” (1 Samuel 19:1). David was forced
to flee as he tried to escape Saul’s attempts to kill him. As Saul sought for David he even sought to
hurt those who so much as helped David: “And the king said unto the footmen
that stood about him, Turn, and slay the priests of the Lord; because their
hand also is with David, and because they knew when he fled, and did not shew
it to me” (1 Samuel 22:17). Saul did not
catch David, though, and eventually David had an opportunity to slay Saul. Saul was in a cave and David and his men came
upon him. His men encouraged him, “Behold,
I will deliver thine enemy into thine hand, that thou mayest do to him as it
shall seem good unto thee.” But David
did not slay the man who was trying so hard to kill him: “The Lord forbid that
I should do this thing unto my master, the Lord’s anointed, to stretch forth
mine hand against him, seeing he is the anointed of the Lord” (1 Samuel 24:4-6). David then confronted Saul in an attempt to
convince the king that he was not trying to harm him. Saul responded, “Thou art more righteous than
I: for thou hast rewarded me good, whereas I have rewarded thee evil” (1 Samuel
24:17). David did good to him that hated
him, and I believe the Lord rewarded him for that. Unfortunately that same attitude did not stay
with David his whole life.
There are of course many other
scriptural characters besides David that also showed their ability to love
their enemies; in Helaman 1 we have an interesting contrast between the son of
Moroni and a son of Pahoran in this regard.
When Paanchi failed to obtain the judgment seat in the contest with his
two brothers, he “was exceedingly wroth; therefore, he was about to flatter
away those people to rise up in rebellion against their brethren” (Helaman 1:7). He was prepared to fight his “enemy” who had
won the judgment seat, and his followers eventually did kill Pahoran after
Paanchi was condemned by the law for his actions. In contrast to that, we have the story of
Moronihah who was the leader of the Nephite forces when the Lamanites came upon
the city of Zarahemla and took it over. After
the Lamanites slayed many people including women and children, Moronihah was
able to defeat his enemies and recapture the city. What he did after that showed his true
character: “Moronihah took possession of the city of Zarahemla again, and
caused that the Lamanites who had been taken prisoners should depart out of the
land in peace” (Helaman 1:33). Like his
father, he had no desire to harm his enemies even though they sought to kill
the Nephites. In contrast to Paanchi,
Moronihah showed true love for his enemies despite seeming justification to do
them much harm.
What’s interesting to me is that
these two both had faithful fathers who had fought valiantly in the previous
war in defense of liberty and who had both showed great reluctance to fight against
their enemies. I don’t know why Paanchi
and Moronihah turned out so differently, but it highlights their individual
agency to choose how they would deal with their fellow man. They did not by default inherit the goodness
of their fathers. We all face similar choices
in our own lives as we interact with others—will we love and do good and bless
our fellow man no matter what their actions are towards us? When others reward us evil, can we reward
them good? That, I believe, is the sign
of a truly great man or woman.
Comments
Post a Comment
Comments: