The Branches of the Allegory of the Olive Tree
This chart
is very helpful in understanding the allegory of the olive tree from Jacob
5. It helps to keep organized what
happens to the main tree and the branches that are grafted in elsewhere. That main tree which represents the house of
Israel is introduced in verse 3: “For behold, thus saith the Lord, I will liken
thee, O house of Israel, like unto a tame olive-tree.” This tree is the main tree of the story, but
there are also several branches from it that are grafted in elsewhere that
reappear several times in the allegory: “I take away any of these
young and tender branches, and I will graft them whithersoever I will”
(v8). These branches appear to represent
the Israelites, like Lehi, who were led away from the people at Jerusalem to
start their own people.
The first of these branches is
introduced in verse 20: “And it came to pass that they went forth whither the
master had hid the natural branches of the tree, and he said unto the servant:
Behold these; and he beheld the first that it had brought forth much fruit; and
he beheld also that it was good.” It was
planted in a “poor spot of ground” and it was doing well when they first
checked on it, and they stored up the fruit.
The second branch of the main tree that is planted elsewhere is described
in these words: “Look hither; behold I have planted another branch of the tree”
(v23). It was planted in a spot that “was
poorer than the first,” and this first time when they went to check on it, it
had “brought forth much fruit.” After
this second branch we are told of a third branch in these terms, “And it came
to pass that the Lord of the vineyard said again unto his servant: Look hither,
and behold another branch also, which I have planted; behold that I
have nourished it also, and it hath brought forth fruit” (v24). Like the first two, they found that it had
brought forth fruit, but the word “much” was not used to describe it.
It is not clear in my mind whether the next
verse, verse 25, describes yet a fourth branch or is a continuation of the
description of the third branch from verse 24.
We read, “And he said unto the servant: Look hither and behold the last.
Behold, this have I planted in a good spot of ground; and I
have nourished it this long time, and only a part of the tree
hath brought forth tame fruit, and the other part of the tree hath
brought forth wild fruit; behold, I have nourished this tree like unto the others.” If this “last” branch is different than the
third branch of verse 24, then that third branch is never mentioned again. This is the interpretation that is used in
the diagram, as can be seen from the fact that the third branch is missing from
the third and fourth visit columns. In my
mind it seems more likely, though, that there were only three branches to begin
with and that the “last” branch of verse 25 is the third branch of 24. This would then make the mention of the
branches in verses 20-25 match verse 39 when they are mentioned again, “And it
came to pass that they went down into the nethermost parts of the vineyard. And
it came to pass that they beheld that the fruit of the natural branches had
become corrupt also; yea, the first and the second and also the last; and they
had all become corrupt” (v39). This
verse suggests that there were only three total, and at this stage—the time of
the apostasy—they were all corrupt. Whether
there were three or four is really not important, but what is central to the
message of this allegory is that the Lord knew and cared deeply for all of them
as He does for all of His children.
Comments
Post a Comment
Comments: