Mahijah
In the account of Enoch in the Pearl of Great Price, we read that the
people feared him and would not lay their hands on him because he walked with
God. There are many details that we have
about Enoch in the account in the book of Moses that aren’t in the Bible, and
one of them is this interesting detail: “And there came a man unto him, whose
name was Mahijah, and said unto him: Tell us plainly who thou art, and from
whence thou comest?” (Moses 6:40) The language
of the verse is somewhat similar to this question that the Jews posed to Christ:
“Then came the Jews round about him, and said unto him, How long dost thou make
us to doubt? If thou be the Christ, tell us plainly” (John 10:24). It seems to me, though, that Mahijah’s
inquiry was much more sincere than that of the Jews who were looking only to
accuse Christ. Mahijah is nowhere else mentioned
in the scriptures, but the name of a place called Mahujah is mentioned a little
later in the story as a place where Enoch heard a voice out of heaven (Moses
7:2). Elder Maxwell also wrote a short
book called The
Enoch Letters in which he depicted Mahijah as an eventually believer in the
words of Enoch. Written like the
Screwtape Letters, Mahijah wrote to a friend describing Enoch and his people
and city. But we really know very little
about the real Mahijah.
In an Ensign
article many years ago Hugh Nibley provided some interesting information about
the names Mahijah and Mahujah. He
observed that the name Mahijah is the only person named in the book of Moses
who is not also in the Bible. He wrote
this about his examination of the book of Enoch found in the Dead Sea
Scrolls: “After having looked through all but the last of the Aramaic Enoch
fragments without finding anything particularly new, and coming to those very
last little fragments, I found the name Mahujah leaping out of the pages again
and again. Could this be our Mahujah or
Mahijah? As a matter of fact it could be
either, not only because the semi-vowels w and y are written very much alike in
the Aramaic script and are sometimes confused by scribes, but also because the
name as written in 4QEn, MHWY, is the same as the MHWY-EL who appears in Gen.
4:18 as the grandfather of Enoch…. So
what? A coincidence—a giant or a Watcher called Mahujah or Mahijah. But far more than a coincidence when taken in
its context. The only thing the Mahijah in the Book of Moses is remarkable for
is his putting of bold direct questions to Enoch, thus giving the patriarch an
opening for calling upon the people to repent, referring them to the book of
remembrance, and telling them of the plan of salvation. And this is exactly the
role, and the only role, that the Aramaic Mahujah plays in the story. The name is found in none of the other Enoch
texts and neither is the story: it is peculiar to the version Joseph Smith gave
us and the oldest known Enoch manuscripts.”
Our account of Enoch in the Pearl of Great Price is a “portion of the
ancient Book of Enoch” according to one manual,
and the fact that the name Mahijah, or at least something very similar, is
found in the oldest known text of the Book of Enoch helps give credence to that
claim. Perhaps Mahijah’s greatest contribution,
though, was his simple reminder to us to both listen sincerely to the Lord’s
messengers and ask sincere questions that will help us discover the messages
the Lord has for us.
I would suggest looking at Colby Townsend's analysis showing that the names in Book of Moses and the Dead Sea Scroll fragments are not the same but only look the same in their English, and that Joseph was familiar with the name Mehujael since it's in Genesis, the book that Joseph was expounding upon. Mahuja is pretty close to Mehujael, so the more likely situation is that Nibley simply wanted to see proof in the Dead Sea Scrolls, rather than the scrolls actually providing any evidence.
ReplyDelete