I Came Not To Send Peace
One surprising statement of the Savior was this one made as
he was training his newly called apostles, “Think not that I am come to send
peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a
man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and
the daughter in law against her mother in law” (Matt. 10:34-35). We might contrast this with other passages
that speak of how the Savior will bring peace, such as this one: “Peace I leave
with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you.
Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid” (John 14:27). He also told his apostles towards the end of His
life, “These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace”
(John 16:44). Abinadi also taught that
the Savior’s mission was one to bring peace: “O how beautiful upon the
mountains are the feet of him that bringeth good tidings, that is the founder
of peace, yea, even the Lord, who has redeemed his people; yea, him who has
granted salvation unto his people” (Mosiah 15:18). Isaiah even called Him the “Prince of peace”
(Isaiah 9:6). Even in our dispensation the
Lord stated, “But learn that he who doeth the works of righteousness shall
receive his reward, even peace in this world, and eternal life in the world to
come” (Doctrine and Covenants 59:23).
Clearly the Lord’s promise to His disciples was peace of some kind—so what
did He mean when He said He was not going to “send peace on earth” and bring a
sword instead of peace?
The
difference seems to be the peace in one’s own heart from living the gospel compared
to the conflict that will always exist among people who reject the teachings of
the Savior. One author
put it this way: “It is true that Christ came to bring peace—peace between the
believer and God, and peace among men. Yet the inevitable result of Christ’s
coming is conflict—between Christ and the antichrist, between light and
darkness, between Christ’s children and the devil’s children. This conflict can
occur even between members of the same family.”
After quoting this, Elder Christofferson explained it this way, “I’m
confident that a number of you have been rejected and ostracized by father and
mother, brothers and sisters as you accepted the gospel of Jesus Christ and
entered into His covenant. In one way or another, your superior love of Christ
has required the sacrifice of relationships that were dear to you, and you have
shed many tears. Yet with your own love undiminished, you hold steady under
this cross, showing yourself unashamed of the Son of God.” President Benson similarly said,
“One of the most difficult tests of all is when you have to choose between
pleasing God or pleasing someone you love or respect—particularly a family
member. The scripture says, ‘Honour thy
father and thy mother’ (Exodus 20:12; see also Mosiah 13:20). Sometimes one
must choose to honor Heavenly Father over a mortal father.” We see this in particular in the story of
Lehi’s family. Lehi and Nephi’s decision
to follow the Savior led to great contention between them and Laman and
Lemuel. The conflict grew so great that
it led to Laman and Lemuel seeking to take away their lives. The peace of the gospel that Nephi had
internally did not eliminate the external conflict that forced him to ultimately
flee from his brethren. We can hold fast
to the promises of the Lord for peace in our individual lives as we repent and
come unto the Savior, but we will not expect the world to be at peace which
fights against the principles of righteousness.
And we may indeed have rifts in our families when we choose to put the
Savior first. In the Savior’s statement,
though, I don’t think he was suggesting at all that we take up literal swords, though
Peter perhaps thought that when he cut off Malchus’s ear and was rebuked by the
Savior for it (John 18:10). Rather we
take the “sword of the spirit, which is the word of God” and use that as our defense
against the world that will largely reject and fight against the teachings of
the Savior (Ephesians 6:17).
Comments
Post a Comment
Comments: